Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

DeepSeek-R1

S-TIER

NVIDIA NIM

Intelligence Score 97/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Phi-4

A-TIER

GitHub Models

Intelligence Score 89/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

DeepSeek-R1 Wins

With an intelligence score of 97/100 vs 89/100, DeepSeek-R1 outperforms Phi-4 by 8 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
DeepSeek-R1
Phi-4
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Dense Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~92-95% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jan 2025 Dec 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
40 requests/minute 10 RPM (high-tier) / higher for mini-tier
Daily Limit
- 50 RPD (high-tier models) / 150 RPD (mini-tier models)
Capabilities
No specific data
Reasoning
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
🐢 Slower (Reasoning) Medium
Primary Use Case
🧠 Complex Reasoning General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Phone number verification required
  • Free credits are limited
  • Rate limits on free tier
  • Restrictive limits
  • Requires GitHub account
  • Rate limits vary by Copilot tier
Key Strengths
  • High performance models
  • Prototyping

Similar Comparisons

DeepSeek-R1
vs
Various Open Models
Phi-4
vs
Various Open Models
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Phi-4
vs
Llama 4 Scout
DeepSeek-R1
vs
GPT-4o
Phi-4
vs
GPT-4o
Phi-4
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Phi-4
vs
Mistral Large (24.11)
Phi-4
vs
Cohere Command R+
Phi-4
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
Phi-4
vs
GPT-5 Chat
Phi-4
vs
GPT-5 Mini