Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
DeepSeek-R1
S-TIERNVIDIA NIM
Intelligence Score
97/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Nebius (Token Factory)
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
Long context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
DeepSeek-R1 Wins
With an intelligence score of 97/100 vs 65/100, DeepSeek-R1 outperforms Qwen3.5 397B A17B by 32 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek-R1.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
DeepSeek-R1
|
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | Long context |
|
Architecture
|
Dense Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
Jan 2025 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
40 requests/minute | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
- | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
🐢 Slower (Reasoning) | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
🧠 Complex Reasoning | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 397B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
DeepSeek-R1
vs
DeepSeek-R1 (Free)
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
DeepSeek-R1 (Free)
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Various Open Models
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Various Open Models
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Kimi K3
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Llama 3.1 70B