Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
DeepSeek-V4 Flash
DEPRECATEDDeepSeek
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
GLM 5.2
Scaleway Generative APIs
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
256K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
DeepSeek-V4 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, DeepSeek-V4 Flash outperforms GLM 5.2 by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek-V4 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
DeepSeek-V4 Flash
|
GLM 5.2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1M | 256K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Dense Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
DeepSeek-V4 Flash
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
DeepSeek-V4 Flash
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
DeepSeek-V4 Flash
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
Mistral Large
GLM 5.2
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
GLM 5.2
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GLM 5.2
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct