Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

DeepSeek-V4 Pro

A-TIER

DeepSeek

Intelligence Score 80/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)

S-TIER

OpenRouter

Intelligence Score 96/100
Context Window 1M
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) Wins

With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 80/100, Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) outperforms DeepSeek-V4 Pro by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
DeepSeek-V4 Pro
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
Context Window
128K 1M
Architecture
Dense Transformer Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~92-95%
Release Date
2024 Dec 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 20 requests/minute
Daily Limit
Credit-based 50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup)
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Undisclosed ~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations
  • 10M tokens is one-time only
  • API can be slow during peak hours (Chinese business hours)
  • Rate limiting during high demand periods
  • Limits depend on account history/topup
  • Community key models
  • Free models have lower priority during peak demand
Key Strengths
  • DeepSeek-R1: OpenAI o1-level reasoning (open-source)
  • Mixture-of-Experts architecture for efficiency
  • OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement)
  • Unified API for 100+ models from all providers
  • OpenAI-compatible endpoint (drop-in replacement)
  • Automatic model fallback and routing

Similar Comparisons