Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

DeepSeek-V4 Pro

A-TIER

DeepSeek

Intelligence Score 80/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

StepFun Step 3.7 Flash

A-TIER

Kilo AI Gateway

Intelligence Score 83/100
Context Window See provider
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

StepFun Step 3.7 Flash Wins

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 80/100, StepFun Step 3.7 Flash outperforms DeepSeek-V4 Pro by 3 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
DeepSeek-V4 Pro
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
Context Window
128K See provider
Architecture
Dense Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 200 requests/hour per IP (free models, per community submission)
Daily Limit
Credit-based Default free models only
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • 10M tokens is one-time only
  • API can be slow during peak hours (Chinese business hours)
  • Rate limiting during high demand periods
  • Free capacity and limits can change; verify on the provider site
  • Listed from community submissions - partly verified
Key Strengths
  • DeepSeek-R1: OpenAI o1-level reasoning (open-source)
  • Mixture-of-Experts architecture for efficiency
  • OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement)
  • OpenAI-compatible API
  • Multi-model access

Similar Comparisons