Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 4.1 Fast
DEPRECATEDGrok (xAI)
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
LFM2.5 2.6B
Kilo AI Gateway
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
65K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 65/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms LFM2.5 2.6B by 31 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 4.1 Fast.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
LFM2.5 2.6B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2M | 65K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (low for free tier) | 200 requests/hour per IP on free models (anonymous use allowed) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Default free models only |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 2.6B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Kilo Auto Free
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Kilo Auto Free
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Poolside Laguna S 2.1
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Poolside Laguna S 2.1
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Poolside Laguna XS 2.1
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Tencent HY3
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Kilo Auto (Free)
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B