Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
S-TIERDeepInfra
Intelligence Score
92/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 92/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Llama 3.1 405B Instruct by 4 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2M | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (low for free tier) | 60 RPM (varies by model) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Credit-based (no daily cap) |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | 🐢 Slower (Reasoning) |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 405B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Scout (free)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct