Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 65/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Llama 3.1 (Deployable) by 31 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 4.1 Fast.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2M | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (low for free tier) | Pay-per-second compute |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Scout (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Scout (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct