Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.3 70B
S-TIERGroq
Intelligence Score
94/100
Context Window
1k RPD, 12k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 94/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Llama 3.3 70B by 2 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
Llama 3.3 70B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2M | 1k RPD, 12k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~88-91% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Dec 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (low for free tier) | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 70B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Scout (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct