Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
Cloudflare Workers AI
Intelligence Score
71/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 71/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Qwen 1.5 7B Chat by 25 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 4.1 Fast.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2M | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~65-69% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (low for free tier) | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 10,000 neurons/day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Chinese
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 7B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
vs
Qwen3 32B (Fast)