Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
S-TIERChutes.ai
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 91/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct by 5 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2M | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (low for free tier) | Varies (community capacity) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Subject to availability |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen3 32B (Fast)
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen3 32B
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen3-Coder-Plus
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
vs
Qwen-Max