Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Any GGUF Model

KoboldCpp

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Customizable
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

LLaVA 1.5 Wins

With an intelligence score of 81/100 vs 65/100, LLaVA 1.5 outperforms Any GGUF Model by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for LLaVA 1.5.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Any GGUF Model
LLaVA 1.5
Context Window
Customizable Local
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
Unlimited Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • UI is functional but dated
  • Mainly for GGUF format
  • Configuration has learning curve
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths
  • Context shifting (Smart Context)
  • Visual Novel mode
  • Stable Diffusion integration
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server

Similar Comparisons

Any GGUF Model
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Any GGUF Model
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Any GGUF Model
vs
Mistral (Any version)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Mistral (Any version)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Phi-3 (Any version)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Mistral 7B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
TinyLlama
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Any Local Model
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Any HuggingFace Model