Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Any HuggingFace Model
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Model-dependent
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
GPT-4o (via Coze)
S-TIERCoze
Intelligence Score
92/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o (via Coze) Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o (via Coze) outperforms Any HuggingFace Model by 27 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via Coze).
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Any HuggingFace Model
|
GPT-4o (via Coze)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
Model-dependent | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | May-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Pay-per-second compute | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Token-based daily limits |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Vision
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | ~1.8T (estimated) |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Mistral (Any version)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Mistral (Any version)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Phi-3 (Any version)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Any GGUF Model
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Any GGUF Model
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Any Local Model
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)