Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Any HuggingFace Model
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Model-dependent
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 72B Wins
With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 65/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Any HuggingFace Model by 26 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Qwen 2.5 72B.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Any HuggingFace Model
|
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
Model-dependent | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Pay-per-second compute | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Mistral (Any version)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Phi-3 (Any version)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B