Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Hugging Face Inference

Intelligence Score 91/100

Context Window Image

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 91/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Flux.1 Dev by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)	Flux.1 Dev
Context Window	200K	Image
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Diffusion
Est. MMLU Score	~88-91%	~85-87%
Release Date	Jun-Oct 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	300 Requests / hour
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Dependent on global load
Capabilities	Reasoning	No specific data
Performance Tier	S-Tier (Elite)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	🎨 Image Generation
Model Size	Unknown	Undisclosed
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Rate limited to ~300 request/hour for free users Models larger than 10GB may not load Cold starts can occur
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Serverless Inference Instant Model Loading Text Generation