Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

GPT-OSS 20B

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 1k RPD, 8k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 65/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms GPT-OSS 20B by 28 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-OSS 20B
Context Window
200K 1k RPD, 8k TPM
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~60-64%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Credit-based 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown 20B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons