Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Jamba 1.5 Large

A-TIER

AI21 Labs

Intelligence Score 88/100
Context Window 256K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 88/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Jamba 1.5 Large by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Jamba 1.5 Large
Context Window
200K 256K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) SSM-Transformer Hybrid (Mamba)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 100 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
Reasoning
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Credits expire after 3 months
  • Unique architecture (check compatibility)
  • Focus on text (no vision yet)
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Jamba: SSM-Transformer Hybrid
  • 256K Context Window
  • Highly efficient inference

Similar Comparisons