Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 405B

S-TIER

Venice.ai

Intelligence Score 91/100
Context Window 128K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 91/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Llama 3.1 405B by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Llama 3.1 405B
Context Window
200K 128K tokens
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~85-87%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 10 RPM (free tier)
Daily Limit
Credit-based Limited daily usage
Capabilities
Reasoning
Reasoning
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium 🐢 Slower (Reasoning)
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown 405B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Free tier has speed/rate limits
  • Pro subscription needed for 405B speed
  • Decentralized network variance
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Zero-Knowledge Proofs for privacy
  • Uncensored model options
  • Decentralized compute network

Similar Comparisons