Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.2 3B

Ollama

Intelligence Score 75/100
Context Window 128K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 75/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Llama 3.2 3B by 18 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Llama 3.2 3B
Context Window
200K 128K tokens
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~70-74%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 Sep 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Hardware limited
Daily Limit
Credit-based Unlimited
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown 3B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Depends on your RAM/GPU
  • Laptop fans will spin up
  • Large models (70B+) need heavy hardware
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Local Inference: Data never leaves your device
  • Modelfiles: Script your own system prompts
  • API: Local REST API for app integration

Similar Comparisons