Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
S-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
93/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
200K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Llama 3.3 70B
S-TIERGroq
Intelligence Score
94/100
Context Window
1k RPD, 12k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.3 70B Wins
With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 93/100, Llama 3.3 70B outperforms Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) by 1 point.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
|
Llama 3.3 70B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
200K | 1k RPD, 12k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~88-91% | ~88-91% |
|
Release Date
|
Jun-Oct 2024 | Dec 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | âš¡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Unknown | 70B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.3 70B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct