Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3 8B Instruct

BentoML

Intelligence Score 71/100
Context Window 8K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 71/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Llama 3 8B Instruct by 22 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Llama 3 8B Instruct
Context Window
200K 8K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~65-69%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
Credit-based Unlimited
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium âš¡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown 8B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Learning curve for 'Bento' concept
  • Deployment requires cloud knowledge
  • Local serving is just step 1
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Unified Model Store
  • Distributed Runner Architecture
  • Deployment Agnostic

Similar Comparisons