Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

A-TIER

Mistral (La Plateforme)

Intelligence Score 80/100

Context Window 128k

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 80/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Mistral Nemo by 13 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)	Mistral Nemo
Context Window	200K	128k
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~88-91%	~75-79%
Release Date	Jun-Oct 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	1 request/second
Daily Limit	Credit-based	-
Capabilities	Reasoning	No specific data
Performance Tier	S-Tier (Elite)	B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Unknown	Undisclosed
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Phone verification required Data training opt-in required 1 request/second rate limit
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Access to Mistral's open-weight models OpenAI-compatible API endpoints Function calling support