Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

A-TIER

DeepInfra

Intelligence Score 89/100
Context Window 64K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 89/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Mixtral 8x22B Instruct by 4 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
Context Window
200K 64K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Mixture of Experts (MoE)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM (varies by model)
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based (no daily cap)
Capabilities
Reasoning
Reasoning Multilingual
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown 22B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • $5 credit is one-time only
  • Credits expire after 90 days
  • Rate limits vary by model
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement)
  • 40+ open-source models hosted
  • Fast inference with optimized serving

Similar Comparisons