Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

Qwen3 32B

Groq

Intelligence Score 79/100
Context Window 1k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 79/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Qwen3 32B by 14 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Qwen3 32B
Context Window
200K 1k RPD, 6k TPM
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~70-74%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Credit-based 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown 32B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Allam 2 7B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Allam 2 7B
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Qwen3 32B
vs
Llama 4 Scout
Qwen3 32B
vs
Whisper Large v3
Qwen3 32B
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
Qwen3 32B
vs
Groq Compound
Qwen3 32B
vs
Groq Compound Mini