Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Codestral Latest
A-TIERLLM7.io
Intelligence Score
86/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
256K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
LFM2.5 2.6B
Kilo AI Gateway
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
65K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Codestral Latest Wins
With an intelligence score of 86/100 vs 65/100, Codestral Latest outperforms LFM2.5 2.6B by 21 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Codestral Latest.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Codestral Latest
|
LFM2.5 2.6B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
256K Context | 65K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
1 req/s, 60/min, 250/hour (free token from dash.llm7.io) | 200 requests/hour per IP on free models (anonymous use allowed) |
|
Daily Limit
|
100,000 tokens per 24h (free token; may be reduced without notice) | Default free models only |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
💻 Code Generation | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 2.6B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Codestral Latest
vs
Codestral
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Codestral
Codestral Latest
vs
Codestral 2508
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Codestral 2508
Codestral Latest
vs
Codestral
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Codestral
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Kilo Auto Free
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Poolside Laguna S 2.1
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Poolside Laguna XS 2.1
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
LFM2.5 2.6B
vs
Tencent HY3