Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Cohere Command R+

A-TIER

GitHub Models

Intelligence Score 80/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 80/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Cohere Command R+ by 12 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Cohere Command R+
GPT-4o (via routing)
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by Copilot Tier 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Low Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Restrictive limits
  • Requires GitHub account
  • Rate limits vary by Copilot tier
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Prototyping
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons

Cohere Command R+
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
Cohere Command R+
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Cohere Command R+
vs
Phi-4
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Phi-4
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Mistral Large (24.11)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)