Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Cohere Command R+
A-TIERGitHub Models
Intelligence Score
80/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
1k RPD, 8k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Cohere Command R+ Wins
With an intelligence score of 80/100 vs 65/100, Cohere Command R+ outperforms GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B by 15 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Cohere Command R+.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Cohere Command R+
|
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 1k RPD, 8k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by Copilot Tier | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Low | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 20B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Cohere Command R+
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
vs
GPT-4o
Cohere Command R+
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Cohere Command R+
vs
Phi-4
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
vs
Phi-4
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
vs
Mistral Large (24.11)
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
vs
Allam 2 7B
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B