Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Cohere Command R+

A-TIER

GitHub Models

Intelligence Score 80/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Jamba 1.5 Large

A-TIER

AI21 Labs

Intelligence Score 88/100
Context Window 256K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Jamba 1.5 Large Wins

With an intelligence score of 88/100 vs 80/100, Jamba 1.5 Large outperforms Cohere Command R+ by 8 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Cohere Command R+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Context Window
128K 256K
Architecture
Transformer SSM-Transformer Hybrid (Mamba)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by Copilot Tier 100 RPM
Daily Limit
Low Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Reasoning
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Restrictive limits
  • Requires GitHub account
  • Rate limits vary by Copilot tier
  • Credits expire after 3 months
  • Unique architecture (check compatibility)
  • Focus on text (no vision yet)
Key Strengths
  • Prototyping
  • Jamba: SSM-Transformer Hybrid
  • 256K Context Window
  • Highly efficient inference

Similar Comparisons

Cohere Command R+
vs
GPT-4o
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
GPT-4o
Cohere Command R+
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Cohere Command R+
vs
Phi-4
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Phi-4
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Mistral Large (24.11)
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Jamba 1.5 Mini