Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Cohere Command R+
A-TIERGitHub Models
Intelligence Score
80/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Llama 3.1 8B
Groq
Intelligence Score
78/100
Context Window
14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Cohere Command R+ Wins
With an intelligence score of 80/100 vs 78/100, Cohere Command R+ outperforms Llama 3.1 8B by 2 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Cohere Command R+
|
Llama 3.1 8B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~70-74% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by Copilot Tier | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Low | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 8B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Cohere Command R+
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Cohere Command R+
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Cohere Command R+
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct