Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Command R+ (08-2024)

A-TIER

Cohere

Intelligence Score 80/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open

meta/llama-3-70b-instruct

A-TIER

Replicate

Intelligence Score 83/100
Context Window 8K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

meta/llama-3-70b-instruct Wins

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 80/100, meta/llama-3-70b-instruct outperforms Command R+ (08-2024) by 3 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Command R+ (08-2024)
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Context Window
128K 8K tokens
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
20 requests/minute Varies by model
Daily Limit
- Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 70b
Limitations
  • Monthly quota shared across all models
  • 1,000 API calls/month on free tier
  • Commercial use restricted on free plan
  • Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive)
  • Cold starts for less popular models
  • Trial credits are minimal
Key Strengths
  • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) built-in
  • Enterprise-grade models
  • Embeddings and reranking models
  • Run any public model with an API
  • Fine-tune existing models easily
  • Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models

Similar Comparisons