Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B
A-TIERCloudflare Workers AI
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
16K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
A-TIERSambaNova Cloud
Intelligence Score
89/100
Context Window
32k Context
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Wins
With an intelligence score of 89/100 vs 83/100, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B outperforms DeepSeek Coder 6.7B by 6 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B
|
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
16K | 32k Context |
|
Architecture
|
Dense Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by model | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
10,000 neurons/day | Dependent on credits |
|
Capabilities
|
Code
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
âš¡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
💻 Code Generation | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
6.7B | 32B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
DeepSeek Coder V2
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
DeepSeek V3
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct