Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
DeepSeek-R1
S-TIERChutes.ai
Intelligence Score
97/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
64K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Phi-2
Cloudflare Workers AI
Intelligence Score
70/100
Context Window
2K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
DeepSeek-R1 Wins
With an intelligence score of 97/100 vs 70/100, DeepSeek-R1 outperforms Phi-2 by 27 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek-R1.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
DeepSeek-R1
|
Phi-2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
64K | 2K |
|
Architecture
|
Dense Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~65-69% |
|
Release Date
|
Jan 2025 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (community capacity) | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
Subject to availability | 10,000 neurons/day |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
🐢 Slower (Reasoning) | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
🧠 Complex Reasoning | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Phi-2
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Phi-2
vs
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2
Phi-2
vs
Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2
Phi-2
vs
Qwen 1.5 7B Chat
Phi-2
vs
DeepSeek Coder 6.7B
Phi-2
vs
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Phi-2
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct