Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
DeepSeek-R1
S-TIERChutes.ai
Intelligence Score
97/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
64K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
A-TIERSambaNova Cloud
Intelligence Score
89/100
Context Window
32k Context
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
DeepSeek-R1 Wins
With an intelligence score of 97/100 vs 89/100, DeepSeek-R1 outperforms Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B by 8 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
DeepSeek-R1
|
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
64K | 32k Context |
|
Architecture
|
Dense Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
Jan 2025 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (community capacity) | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
Subject to availability | Dependent on credits |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
🐢 Slower (Reasoning) | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
🧠 Complex Reasoning | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 32B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct