Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)

A-TIER

NVIDIA NIM

Intelligence Score 80/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Long context
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Qwen3.8 27B

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 131K Context
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) Wins

With an intelligence score of 80/100 vs 65/100, DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813) outperforms Qwen3.8 27B by 15 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
Qwen3.8 27B
Context Window
Long context 131K Context
Architecture
Dense Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
40 requests/minute 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
- 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 27B
Limitations
  • Phone number verification required
  • Free credits are limited
  • Rate limits on free tier
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • High performance models
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (0813)
vs
DeepSeek: V4 Flash (free)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
DeepSeek: V4 Flash (free)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
DeepSeek-R1 (Free)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
DeepSeek Coder V2
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
DeepSeek V3
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Various Open Models
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 4 Scout