Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 90/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 1M
Pricing Model Free / Open

Qwen 2.5 72B

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Qwen 2.5 72B Wins

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 90/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze) by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
Qwen 2.5 72B
Context Window
1M 32K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~85-87%
Release Date
Feb-May 2024 Sep-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Token-based daily limits Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps General Purpose
Model Size
~1.5T (estimated) 72B
Limitations
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
  • Credits are limited ($1)
  • Decentralized nature may vary latency
  • Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
Key Strengths
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace
  • Verifiable Inference (verified computing)
  • Low Cost due to decentralized compute
  • Privacy focused

Similar Comparisons