Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Gemini 1.5 Pro

S-TIER

Google AI Studio

Intelligence Score 90/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 2M Context, 2 RPM
Pricing Model Free / Open

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 90/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Gemini 1.5 Pro by 3 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window
2M Context, 2 RPM 200K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~88-91%
Release Date
Feb-May 2024 Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
2-15 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
1,500 RPD (Flash) / 50 RPD (Pro) Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
Reasoning
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
âš¡ Very Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
âš¡ Fast Chat & Apps General Purpose
Model Size
~1.5T (estimated) Unknown
Limitations
  • Data used for training (Unpaid tier)
  • Rate limits are enforced per minute/day
  • No SLA for free tier
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Multimodal Capabilities
  • Huge Context Window (up to 2M tokens)
  • Fast Inference Speed
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons