Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Gemini 1.5 Pro

S-TIER

Google AI Studio

Intelligence Score 90/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 2M Context, 2 RPM
Pricing Model Free / Open

Qwen 2.5 72B

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100
Context Window 32K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Qwen 2.5 72B Wins

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 90/100, Qwen 2.5 72B outperforms Gemini 1.5 Pro by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Qwen 2.5 72B
Context Window
2M Context, 2 RPM 32K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~85-87%
Release Date
Feb-May 2024 Sep-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
2-15 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
1,500 RPD (Flash) / 50 RPD (Pro) Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
âš¡ Very Fast âš¡ Fast
Primary Use Case
âš¡ Fast Chat & Apps General Purpose
Model Size
~1.5T (estimated) 72B
Limitations
  • Data used for training (Unpaid tier)
  • Rate limits are enforced per minute/day
  • No SLA for free tier
  • Credits are limited ($1)
  • Decentralized nature may vary latency
  • Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
Key Strengths
  • Multimodal Capabilities
  • Huge Context Window (up to 2M tokens)
  • Fast Inference Speed
  • Verifiable Inference (verified computing)
  • Low Cost due to decentralized compute
  • Privacy focused

Similar Comparisons