Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Gemini 2.0 Flash
S-TIER
Intelligence Score
93/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
S-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
93/100
Context Window
200K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Gemini 2.0 Flash Wins
Equal intelligence scores (93/100), but Gemini 2.0 Flash offers a significantly larger context window.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Gemini 2.0 Flash
|
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1M | 200K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~88-91% | ~88-91% |
|
Release Date
|
Dec 2024 | Jun-Oct 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
2,000 RPM | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
1,500 requests/day (free tier) | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
âš¡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
âš¡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.5T (estimated) | Unknown |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Gemini 2.0 Flash
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Gemini 2.0 Flash
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
Gemini 2.0 Flash
vs
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)