Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Gemini 2.0 Flash

S-TIER

Google

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 1M
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

A-TIER

Chutes.ai

Intelligence Score 88/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Gemini 2.0 Flash Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 88/100, Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms Llama 3.1 70B Instruct by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context Window
1M 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~80-84%
Release Date
Dec 2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
2,000 RPM Varies (community capacity)
Daily Limit
1,500 requests/day (free tier) Subject to availability
Capabilities
Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps General Purpose
Model Size
~1.5T (estimated) 70B
Limitations
  • API key required
  • Rate limits vary by region
  • Availability depends on community GPU donors
  • Speed varies with demand
  • Models may be temporarily unavailable
Key Strengths
  • Massive context window
  • Multimodal
  • Fast inference
  • Community-powered GPU network
  • Free access to large open-source models
  • OpenAI-compatible API format

Similar Comparisons