Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Gemini 2.0 Flash

S-TIER

Google

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 1M
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model

LLaVA 1.5

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Gemini 2.0 Flash Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 81/100, Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms LLaVA 1.5 by 12 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Gemini 2.0 Flash
LLaVA 1.5
Context Window
1M Local
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~75-79%
Release Date
Dec 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
2,000 RPM Hardware dependent
Daily Limit
1,500 requests/day (free tier) Unlimited
Capabilities
Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Vision
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps General Purpose
Model Size
~1.5T (estimated) Undisclosed
Limitations
  • API key required
  • Rate limits vary by region
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths
  • Massive context window
  • Multimodal
  • Fast inference
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server

Similar Comparisons

Gemini 2.0 Flash
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Gemini 2.0 Flash
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
Gemini 2.0 Flash
vs
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Gemini 1.5 Flash
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Mistral 7B
LLaVA 1.5
vs
TinyLlama
LLaVA 1.5
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)