Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Gemini 2.0 Flash

S-TIER

Google

Intelligence Score 93/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 1M

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Commercial/Paid Model

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100

Context Window 32K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 91/100, Gemini 2.0 Flash outperforms Qwen 2.5 72B by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Gemini 2.0 Flash	Qwen 2.5 72B
Context Window	1M	32K
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~88-91%	~85-87%
Release Date	Dec 2024	Sep-Nov 2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	2,000 RPM	60 RPM
Daily Limit	1,500 requests/day (free tier)	Credit-based
Capabilities	Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode	No specific data
Performance Tier	S-Tier (Elite)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	⚡ Very Fast	⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps	General Purpose
Model Size	~1.5T (estimated)	72B
Limitations	API key required Rate limits vary by region	Credits are limited ($1) Decentralized nature may vary latency Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
Key Strengths	Massive context window Multimodal Fast inference	Verifiable Inference (verified computing) Low Cost due to decentralized compute Privacy focused