Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
A-TIERHugging Face Inference
Intelligence Score
80/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
8k
Pricing Model
Free / Open
GPT-4o (via Coze)
S-TIERCoze
Intelligence Score
92/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o (via Coze) Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 80/100, GPT-4o (via Coze) outperforms Gemma 2 9B Instruct by 12 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
|
GPT-4o (via Coze)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
8k | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | May-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
300 Requests / hour | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
Dependent on global load | Token-based daily limits |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Vision
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
9B | ~1.8T (estimated) |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Gemma 2 9B
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Flux.1 Dev
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Gemma 2 (Local)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)