Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Gemma 4 31B (preview)
SambaNova Cloud
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Long context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERRouteway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, Step 3.7 Flash outperforms Gemma 4 31B (preview) by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Gemma 4 31B (preview)
|
Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
Long context | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by model | 5 RPM (community submission) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Dependent on credits | 200 requests/day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
31B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Gemma 4 31B (preview)
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Gemma 4 31B (preview)
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Gemma 4 31B (preview)
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct