Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Gemma 4 31B
Friendli AI
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Qwen3.8 27B
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
131K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Gemma 4 31B Wins
Equal intelligence scores (65/100), but Gemma 4 31B offers a significantly larger context window.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Gemma 4 31B
|
Qwen3.8 27B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | 131K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
31B | 27B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Gemma 2 9B
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Gemma 4 31B
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Gemma 2 9B Instruct
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Gemma 4 31B (preview)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Gemma 2 (Local)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Allam 2 7B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B