Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GLM-4 9B 0414
SiliconFlow
Intelligence Score
71/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
32K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Codestral (2508)
A-TIERMistral AI
Intelligence Score
86/100
Context Window
256K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT
Codestral (2508) Wins
With an intelligence score of 86/100 vs 71/100, Codestral (2508) outperforms GLM-4 9B 0414 by 15 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Codestral (2508).
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GLM-4 9B 0414
|
Codestral (2508)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
32K Context | 256K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~65-69% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Fixed limits for free models — exact figures require login, verify on cloud.siliconflow.cn/models | 5,000 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Not fully published — verify on docs.siliconflow.cn | Based on tier |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
9B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GLM-4 9B 0414
vs
Codestral
Codestral (2508)
vs
Codestral
GLM-4 9B 0414
vs
GLM-4.5-Flash
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM-4.5-Flash
GLM-4 9B 0414
vs
GLM-4.7-Flash
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM-4.7-Flash
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM-4.6V-Flash (vision)
Codestral (2508)
vs
Codestral
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM-4.5 Flash
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM-4.7 Flash
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM-4.6V Flash
Codestral (2508)
vs
Qwen3 8B