Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GLM 5.2
Scaleway Generative APIs
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
256K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Codestral (2508)
A-TIERMistral AI
Intelligence Score
86/100
Context Window
256K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT
Codestral (2508) Wins
With an intelligence score of 86/100 vs 65/100, Codestral (2508) outperforms GLM 5.2 by 21 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Codestral (2508).
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GLM 5.2
|
Codestral (2508)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
256K Context | 256K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 5,000 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Based on tier |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GLM 5.2
vs
Codestral
Codestral (2508)
vs
Codestral
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM 5.3
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM 5.3
Codestral (2508)
vs
Mistral Large
Codestral (2508)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
Codestral (2508)
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Codestral (2508)
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Codestral (2508)
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B