Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GLM-Z1 9B
SiliconFlow
Intelligence Score
71/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Codestral (2508)
A-TIERMistral AI
Intelligence Score
86/100
Context Window
256K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT
Codestral (2508) Wins
With an intelligence score of 86/100 vs 71/100, Codestral (2508) outperforms GLM-Z1 9B by 15 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Codestral (2508).
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GLM-Z1 9B
|
Codestral (2508)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
256K | |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~65-69% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Fixed limits for free models — exact figures require login, verify on cloud.siliconflow.cn/models | 5,000 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Not fully published — verify on docs.siliconflow.cn | Based on tier |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 💻 Code Generation |
|
Model Size
|
9B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GLM-Z1 9B
vs
Codestral
Codestral (2508)
vs
Codestral
GLM-Z1 9B
vs
Codestral
Codestral (2508)
vs
Codestral
GLM-Z1 9B
vs
Qwen3 8B
Codestral (2508)
vs
Qwen3 8B
Codestral (2508)
vs
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM 5.3 Flash
Codestral (2508)
vs
Qwen3.5 4B
Codestral (2508)
vs
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
Codestral (2508)
vs
GLM-4 9B 0414
Codestral (2508)
vs
Xing4.0 29B A4B