Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
S-TIEROpenRouter
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1M
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
Equal intelligence scores (96/100), but Grok 4.1 Fast offers a significantly larger context window.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
|
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1M | 2M |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~92-95% |
|
Release Date
|
Dec 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 requests/minute | Varies (low for free tier) |
|
Daily Limit
|
50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup) | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.5T (estimated) | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Mistral: Small 3 (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Microsoft: Phi-3 Medium (free)