Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
S-TIEROpenRouter
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
A-TIERRequesty
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 87/100, Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free) outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 9 points.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
|
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1M | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
Dec 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 requests/minute | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup) | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.5T (estimated) | 70B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|