Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o (via Coze)
S-TIERCoze
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Allam 2 7B
Groq
Intelligence Score
76/100
Context Window
7k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o (via Coze) Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 76/100, GPT-4o (via Coze) outperforms Allam 2 7B by 16 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o (via Coze).
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o (via Coze)
|
Allam 2 7B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 7k RPD, 6k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~70-74% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by model | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Token-based daily limits | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | 7B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o
Allam 2 7B
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Groq Compound Mini
Allam 2 7B
vs
Groq Compound Mini
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
Allam 2 7B
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
Allam 2 7B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
Allam 2 7B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
Allam 2 7B
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
Allam 2 7B
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
Allam 2 7B
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Allam 2 7B
vs
Qwen3 32B